"No man can become rich without himself enriching others"
Andrew Carnegie



Showing posts with label STOCK NEWS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label STOCK NEWS. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2012

RPT-Wall St Week Ahead: Earnings, Bernanke Promise Active

English: A frame from a screencast from the US...
 The frame shows Chairmen Ben Bernanke responding to a question posited by John E. Sweeney Full Committee (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Investors are looking at an onslaught this week. If it's not corporate earnings, it's Ben Bernanke talking about economic issues before Congress. Recent warnings from a number of companies, including chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices, helped drag the S&P 500 lower for six straight days before a Friday rebound.
The S&P 500 and Dow erased losses for the week, barely finishing higher by 0.2 percent and less than 0.1 percent, respectively. The Nasdaq composite fell 1 percent for the week.
With a slew of companies set to report results this week, the hope among investors is that the bad news has been factored in, but the broader picture remains lackluster. That may limit the market's gains even if companies clear a low bar.
'Expectations have been beaten down a lot,' said Robbert Van Batenburg, head of equity research at Louis Capital in New York. 'The problem is we're dealing with a global slowdown, and I'm sure that's going to be reflected in some of the comments you're going to be hearing.'
Data showing slower growth in Europe, China and the United States has weighed on the stock market, while U.S. companies have warned about overseas weakness and a stronger dollar hurting profits on exports.
The minutes from the Federal Reserve's June meeting suggested it is not ready to inject more monetary stimulus into the economy, but traders will be hanging on Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke's every word for mention of such a possibility and how he views the slowing economy. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Industrials Sector

English: The Mutual Fund Store office, 37308 S...
English: The Mutual Fund Store office, 37308 Six Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
To identify the best and avoid the worst ETFs and mutual funds within the Industrials sector, investors need a predictive rating based on (1) stocks ratings of the holdings and (2) the all-in expenses of each ETF and mutual fund in every sector and style are here.
Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the sector. Not all Industrials sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 20 to 368), which creates drastically different investment implications and ratings. The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst ETFs and mutual funds, which allocate too much value to Neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.
To identify the best and avoid the worst ETFs and mutual funds within the Industrials sector, investors need a predictive rating based on (1) stocks ratings of the holdings and (2) the all-in expenses of each ETF and mutual fund. Investors need not rely on backward-looking ratings. My fund rating methodology is detailed here.
Investors should not buy any Industrials ETFs or mutual funds because none get an Attractive-or-better rating. If you must have exposure to this sector, you should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better-rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved fund fees. Active management has a long history of not paying off. ... Continue to Read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Already in a Recession? Not So Fast.

Recession special at Gray's Papaya shop
Recession special at Gray's Papaya shop (Photo credit: Ed Yourdon)
By Robert Johnson, CFA | Morningstar



A couple of notable economists, including Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI, have recently indicated that they believe the economy may have already drifted back into yet another recession, and it will just be a matter of months before we realize it. The data we have today (although I caution these figures could be revised again) do not support that conclusion.
While many commentators define a recession as two negative quarters of GDP growth, the official statisticians look at four metrics: industrial production, retail sales adjusted for inflation, personal income less transfer payments (unemployment, disability, Social Security) adjusted for inflation, and employment. Most of the metrics are currently improving after hitting lower growth rates earlier in 2012. Only retail sales are in a clear downward trend, and that is largely because of falling gasoline prices, which is actually a good thing for the economy.
I have posted the year-over-year growth rates for these metrics for December 2007, the last time we went into a recession. In every case, current readings are ahead of the December 2007 readings. Some of those 2007 indicators had been in a freefall for some time before the official December 2007 recession start date. That doesn't seem to be the case just yet this time. ... Continue to read.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Rich, Very Rich, and, Now, the 'Volatile' Rich

Income tax
Income tax (Photo credit: Alan Cleaver)
The rich tend to be lumped together as one economic group, as if people earning $250000 a year (or even $1 million a year) are pretty much the same as those making $50 million. But a new analysis of top incomes tells us that there is a big difference between the super-rich and the merely rich in how they earn money. The paper, from Roberton Williams of the Tax Policy Center, compares two sets of 2009 IRS data. One group is American tax filers reporting income of $1 million or more. The other is for the 400 top earners in America, who made an average of $271 million each. Americans with an adjusted gross income of $1 million or more make about a third of that from salaries and wages. Capital gains used to account for more than a third of their income, but since 2000 that share has fallen to 17 percent. Today, the largest share of their take comes from "other income" - mainly earnings from partnerships or S-corps, as well as other capital gainsThe "fortunate 400" - or top 400 earners - make much more of their income from capital gains and other income than from salaries and wages, which account for only 9 percent of their income. Capital gains as a share of their income has also fallen, from 72 percent in 2000 to 46 percent in 2009. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 13, 2012

Roadmap to the Best & Worst Sectors for ETFs & Mutual Funds

English: The Mutual Fund Store office, 37308 S...
English: The Mutual Fund Store office, 37308 Six Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Each quarter, we provide the most comprehensive review of equity ETFs and mutual funds available. We review the Best & Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds by sector and style. We also identify the overall best sectors and investment styles for ETFs and for mutual funds. We begin the 3Q12 series with our Sector Roadmap report. Over the next two weeks, we will publish 20+ reports on each sector and style. We will also publish a Style Roadmap report and a review of how well investors allocate assets to the best ETFs & funds.
Only one sector, Consumer Staples, earns my Attractive rating. See Figure 1 for my rankings of all ten sectors. My sector ratings are based on the aggregation of my fund ratings for every ETF and mutual fund in each sector.
Investors looking for quality sector funds that hold quality stocks should look no further than the Consumer Staples, Information Technology and Health Care sectors. These three sectors house 33 of the 37 Attractive-or-better rated funds. Figures 4 and 6 provide details. The primary drivers behind an Attractive fund rating are good portfolio management, or good stock picking, and low total annual costs.
See Figures 4 through 13 for a detailed breakdown of ratings distributions by sector. See my free ETF & mutual fund screener for rankings, ratings and free reports on 7000+ mutual funds and 400+ ETFs. My fund rating methodology is detailed here. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 12, 2012

China’s ‘5 apocalypses’ signal global recession

English: China Premier Wen Jiabao deliver the ...
English: China Premier Wen Jiabao deliver the Report on the Work of the Government at the Third Session of the Eleventh National People's Congress on March 5, 2010 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. (MarketWatch) — America’s facing not one but four “fiscal cliffs”: Bush-era tax cuts, Pentagon budget cuts, social-program cuts and the continuing battle over “Obamacare.” China, though, has even bigger problems.
Five months ago, we quoted World Bank President Robert Zoellick’s warning of “a spreading crisis” in China that could consume the $75 trillion global economy. Back then we bluntly asked: “China? Or America? Who will crash the global economy first?” Think: China. See First Take: China headed for a landing.
Reuters China’s slowdown has markets on edge all over the world.
China’s economy of 1.3 billion people continues slowing, according to the latest GDP-forecast downgrade from Premier Wen Jiabao, reported Keith Bradsher of the New York Times. Earlier this week, MarketWatch’s Carla Mozee reported that China’s slowdown is already impacting stocks in Brazil, one of China’s leading trading partners. Full story: Brazil stocks drop on China slowdown worries.
So let’s shift our attention away from election-year bickering and ask: “Will China push America into a recession and new bear market?”
“China might already be in recession,” warns Trefor Moss in his brilliant “5 Signs of the Chinese Economic Apocalypse” in the journal Foreign Policy. Actually, five huge apocalypses. “The numbers show that the country’s storied growth engine has slipped out of gear. ... Continue to read.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Gold ETFs are Nearing Breakout Levels

NYC - FiDi: American Stock Exchange Building
NYC - FiDi: American Stock Exchange Building (Photo credit: wallyg)
Gold prices have stabilized in recent weeks, moving within a range between the May low and June high price. But as gold nears a couple key support levels, a breakout is becoming a possibility. Gold-related ETFs provide a way for investors to participate in the movement of gold prices - both directly and indirectly. Four actively traded gold-related ETFs provide slightly different trade set-ups, but all are affected by the movement of gold prices. With the potential for a big move to ensue following the breakout, now is a good time to watching gold-related ETFs. The SPDR Gold Shares (ARCA:GLD) ETF is one of the most popular gold ETFs. The ETF seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the price movement of gold. After hitting an all-time at $185.85 on September 6, 2011 the ETF has been in a downtrend. On December 29, the ETF put in a 52-week low at $148.27, a level that has not been seen since. This is primary support, which if broken, would break a large triangle formation signaling a further slide in the price of the ETF. The long-term targets for such a move are $123 and $111.50. Before that occurs, though, there is support at $150 and also $148.60. On the other hand, a rise back above the June 6 intra-day high at $159.20 could spark some buying interest, propelling the ETF into trendline resistance currently at $165. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Gold Miners are Cheap, Cheap, Cheap!

Super Pit gold mine at Kalgoorlie in Western A...
Super Pit gold mine at Kalgoorlie in Western Australia is Australia's largest open-pit mine (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Gold mining shares deserve their own discussion. I am bullish on gold without qualification. I am also bullish on gold miners…but with one very large qualification: they must produce positive cash flowI think the bull market in gold is intact. And I think gold prices will make highs within a year. However, gold stocks have done poorly. Few have been spared. Like the other mining companies, they suffer from the same affliction: an eager willingness to take whatever cash they generate and dump it right back into the ground.
So even though the four largest listed gold miners — Goldcorp, Barrick, Newmont and Newcrest — generated $47.5 billion in operating cash flows in the last decade, they spent $62.5 billion in new mines, acquisitions and other capital expenditures. The big four have made no money in one of the greatest gold bull markets on record. In fact, they’ve lost money. How did they make up this deficit? They sold more shares to the ever-gullible public — always a sucker for a good story about buried treasure. The number of shares outstanding rose 117% in the decade. I’ve railed before about the management of gold miners. And I’ve tried to find gold miners in which the management teams do intelligent things. But it is hard. Even when you think you have found a team that says all the right things and looks as if it can do it, it does stuff that makes you scratch your head.... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Top stock fund is still a bad bet

The Mutual Fund Show logo
The Mutual Fund Show logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
BOSTON (MarketWatch) — In the mutual fund business, performance forgives all sins. But when investors overlook flaws that would be deal-breakers if not for good recent results, they're headed for trouble.
Consider Berkshire Focus Fund BFOCX -1.20%  , which had the best performance of any technology fund in the year’s first half, according to investment researcher Morningstar Inc. But despite that strong showing — and even because of it — this fund is the Stupid Investment of the Week. Stupid Investment of the Week showcases concerns and characteristics that make a security less than ideal for average investors, in the hope that spotlighting trouble in one situation will make it easier to avoid elsewhere.
The one tradition for this column — which is not intended as an automatic sell signal — is that a fund leading its peer group as the year reaches its midpoint always earns a booby prize for its fast first-half results. The basic premise is that hot funds with fabulous but volatile short-term performance regress to the mean, so investors who buy after the hot streak only experience the next downturn. Yet the calendar itself does not dictate the sustainability of an investment track record; sometimes momentum can be sustained long enough so that a shareholder who jumps after a hot fund could come away happy.
That said, if you wanted to bet on which funds would be unable to sustain momentum, it’s the ones with characteristics that typically send a fund to the dog house. Even all-time losers such as the now-defunct Steadman Funds, American Heritage Fund or Frontier Micro-cap Fund — which generated massive losses for anyone fool enough to stick with them — topped the charts for three- or six months. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Bond ETF Market Forecast to Hit $2 Trillion

Deutsch: ETF-Tower in Frauenfeld (Eidgenössisc...
Deutsch: ETF-Tower in Frauenfeld (Eidgenössisches Turnfest) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
ETF Trends offers news, articles, and research tools for ETF investors and investing. Although the first ETFs were stock-based funds, the fixed-income side of the business is rapidly catching up as nervous investors continue to shun equities and pile into the perceived safety of bonds.
BlackRock’s iShares predicts that assets in global fixed-income ETFs will grow to over $2 trillion from $302 billion currently, over the next decade. In the U.S., iShares forecasts that the bond ETF segment will likely grow to $1.4 trillion from $222 billion. “The dynamic forces driving the long-term expansion of the fixed income ETF market have been especially evident this year, with the market attracting some of its strongest asset flows to date,” said Jennifer Grancio, head of iShares global business development at BlackRock. “Yet even after a decade of continuous growth, fixed income ETFs are still just scratching the surface of their potential.” Risk-averse investors are favoring bond ETFs over equities. Fixed-income ETFs listed in the U.S. have gathered $35.1 million year to date, according to data from the ETF Industry Association. [Bond ETFs Remain Top Draw in June]At the end of June, there was $1.2 trillion in U.S.-based ETFs. There was $564.1 billion in U.S. equity ETFs, $246.5 billion in international stock funds and $222.1 billion in the fixed-income category. There are fixed-income ETFs tracking U.S. Treasuries, corporate bonds, muni bonds and other sectors. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Hedge funds plow most into commods in 2 years as third quarter

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Hedge funds and other big commodity investors pumped a notional $13 billion into U.S. energy, grains and metals markets in the week to July 3, the biggest influx in at least two years, after a debt deal in Europe sparked a buying frenzy across the sector. Led by surges in soybean, corn, gold and oil positions, the funds, known by the regulatory moniker "managed money", increased their bullish net long positions to above $77 billion for the week to July 3, according to Reuters calculations based on the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission's weekly data. Reuters data shows it was the biggest weekly increase in net longs since at least 2010. Just five weeks ago, net longs held by hedge funds and other money managers in commodities were at their lowest levels for this year at $56 billion. The 19-commodity Thomson Reuters-Jefferies CRB index surged 7.3 percent during the week to July 3, the biggest five-day rally since August 2009. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, July 9, 2012

China slowdown weighs on emerging market funds

China's FIRST McDonald's
China's FIRST McDonald's (Photo credit: flickr.Marcus)
As China slips, the second-half performance for many emerging market mutual funds might soon follow. In recent months, investors have been pulling hundreds of millions of dollars out of stock funds that invest mainly in companies associated with the big four emerging market nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China. But it's China that is causing most of the worry for fund investors, amid signs that the world's second-largest economy is slowing more sharply than expected. Even emerging market bull Jim O'Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, who famously coined the BRIC acronym, said he's been a bit surprised by the slowdown in China. But that said, O'Neill remains convinced China's economy will be more than enough to make up for any weakness in the other BRIC nations. "It is making the trajectory that I predicted difficult to stick with," O'Neill said about the slowdown. But he added, "I find it hilarious that people question the thesis on the basis of two quarters." ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Avoid Overdiversification in Your Portfolio

Investment Frontiers Symposia
Investment Frontiers Symposia (Photo credit: apec2011ceosummit)
Everyone talks about diversification but hardly anyone mentions the tyranny of overdiversification. Portfolio diversification has been a foundation of investment management for decades. The basic idea is to hold different types of investments within the same portfolio to avoid getting crushed if and when the market tanks. Diversification isn’t designed to prevent losses, but rather, to minimize them. While most financial professionals advocate diversifying your investments, the problem of overdiversification is almost never discussed. What is it?
An overdiversified portfolio is one that holds too many of the same types of investments. Instead of owning a well-designed basket of various investments that complement each other, the investor who suffers from overdiversification ends up owning investments that appear different, but are essentially the same. What’s the end result? A portfolio with too much of the same thing.
Below is a snapshot of Portfolio X, which consists of just five holdings. Can you identify which holdings are overlapping? If you said ticker AGTHX, FCNTX, and QQQ – you’re right! Each of these investments, despite having different labels, own the same types of stocks; large cap growth companies. Owning these three investments within the same portfolio is a classic example of overdiversification.... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 6, 2012

How JP Morgan's 'Whale' Loss Got Bigger

English: Category:JPMorgan Chase
English: Category:JPMorgan Chase (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Back in May, the big news was that  J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM) had lost $2 billion on a derivatives hedge gone wrong. I wrote an article then entitled, "The Moral of J.P. Morgan's Derivative Debacle," which explained what was going on from a derivatives perspective--at least as much as was possible from the information available at the time. Recently, media outlets are reporting the $2 billion losses have swollen to anywhere from $5 billion (according to theFinancial Times) to as much as $9 billion (according to a New York Times quote of J.P. Morgan's internal worst-case estimate). Many people read this news and think "Wow! Derivatives are so dangerous and complex that J.P. Morgan doesn't know if it's lost $2 billion or $9 billion!"
In fact, the ballooning of the loss estimates has less to do with derivatives than it does with a micro-cap rubber plantation in Indonesia. Allow me to explain... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Recent Corn Rally in Context of Twenty Years of Corn Futures Prices

English: A display of six ears of field corn w...
English: A display of six ears of field corn with dented yellow kernels (Zea mays var. indentata) which won ribbons for "best of show" at the Steele County Fair in Owatonna, Minnesota (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
 Since the launch of the Teucrium Commodity Trust Corn Fund ETF (CORN) in June 2010, investors who were unwilling to open up a futures account have been able to take long and short positions on corn via the CORN ETF, which holds a basket of corn futures. Investors who are new to corn or to commodities in general may have been surprised by the big move in CORN, which is up 20% in the past two weeks and 28% over the course of the past month. No doubt they probably believe that the move in CORN (and corn futures) is likely to soon be exhausted. While CORN/corn may indeed be about to peak, I would urge new arrivals on the commodity scene to study the history of agricultural commodities prices over the years and note that extreme price moves are not uncommon, particularly when unusual weather patterns are involved. The chart below uses monthly bars of corn futures over the course of the last 20 years. Note that while the June-July 2012 move in corn looks impressive, it pales in comparison to the spikes in corn prices that occurred in 1994-1996, 2005-2008 and 2010-2011. In other words, this could be just the beginning of a huge move in corn prices, particularly given that the price move of the last month or so comes on top of a much higher base. Corn may be putting in a top soon, but a fat-tailed spike is not guaranteed to top out at the prior highs of $8.00 per bushel. As an aside, if you are going to trade CORN or corn futures, it would certainly help to become a weather guru, but be forewarned that understanding the weather nuances that affect corn prices is no easy task. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 5, 2012

PIMCO Great Return

Green Day Concert Stage (Montreal) - Green Day...
Green Day Concert Stage (Montreal) - Green Day is Ever Green (Photo credit: Anirudh Koul)
PIMCO Total Return ETF (NYSEArca: BOND) manager Bill Gross promised big things when the fund launched earlier this year, and the ETF has not disappointed. In short order, the ETF has already attracted more than $1.7 billion in assets under management, including an impressive $200 million that entered the fund just last week.
And BOND, being an unabashedly “actively managed” ETF, the quick progress of the fund has turned heads on both the retail and institutional fronts as actively managed products have simply failed to become briskly embraced by investors until now, as a general rule. Two months ago we highlighted BOND, noting encouraging early performance of the ETF versus its well known and established mutual fund version counterpart, the PIMCO Total Return (PTTAX).
This trend has certainly continued, as BOND has rallied an impressive 3.81% since inception in March of this year with PTTAX up only 1.99% during the same time period. Currently, top holdings in BOND include U.S. Treasury Notes, FNMA (Fannie Mae) and SLMA (Sallie Mae Student Loan) obligations, as well as FHLMC (Freddie Mac) securities, and the fund charges what we believe is a generous 0.55% expense ratio.
In the world of actively managed mutual funds, and much less actively managed ETFs, where the ultimate goal of the product is to deliver alpha to some stated benchmark, we find that expense ratios on similar products to BOND typically range well north of 1%. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Dividend Income Versus Dividend Growth

Income Tax Cocktail
Income Tax Cocktail (Photo credit: Kenn Wilson)
Just because a stock pays a dividend, it doesn't mean that its growth days are behind it. Apple(AAPL), which plans to pay its first dividend later this quarter, is still projected to grow earnings by 22%  per year over the next five years. Apple plans to pay a quarterly dividend of about $ 2.65 per share. That equates to a dividend payout ratio of about 26% of earnings, based on forecasts of $ 10.33 in per share earnings for the next quarter and a low dividend yield of about 1.9%. The conventional wisdom is that the higher the payout ratio, the lower the future earnings growth.
Let’s say that a firm has $ 100 in capital and income of $ 10, for a return on capital of 10%. If it pays out 70% of earnings as a dividend, it would pay a $ 7 dividend and keep $ 3 as additional paid in capital. The next year, capital starts out at $ 103, and if we assume that the firm earns a 10% return on capital again, earnings would grow to $ 10.30 for 3% earnings growth. The more earnings the firm keeps, the greater the capital base and the faster earnings will grow. For example, if the payout ratio had been only 20%, the capital base would have grown to $ 108 and the 10% return on capital would result in earnings of $ 10.80, for 8% earnings growth. Of course, the higher the payout, the higher the current dividend yield is likely to be. Because utilities companies typically have steady capital needs with few growth opportunities, they tend to have high payout ratios and higher dividend yields, while tech firms have historically had low payout ratios as they often have many growth opportunities. ... Continue to read.
Enhanced by Zemanta