"No man can become rich without himself enriching others"
Andrew Carnegie



Showing posts with label swing trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label swing trading. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Believe It or Not, the Bulls Still Have Plenty of Muscle

An einem Sonntag im August...
(Photo credit: Concentrated Passion)
Russell, NYSE Composite still pushing upward


Chart Key
The Russell 2000 made a new all-time high yesterday with its intraday high of 1,082. The Russell 2000 — like its cousin, the Nasdaq (see Wednesday’s chart and comment) — is trading within a bull channel, but unlike the Nasdaq, it has no resistance above it to hamper further new highs. MACD is slightly overbought but could become more overbought as the index continues its dogged advance.
The NYSE Composite is a broad-based index containing all stocks traded on the Big Board. Its chart pattern is much like that of the S&P 500 (see Monday’s chart), which recently made a new all-time high. But the NYSE’s new high at 9,906 — made last Wednesday — was unlike the S&P 500 in that it has not seen a new high since May, and its all-time high at 10,387 was made in October 2007.
Conclusion: Despite yet another down day, the short-, intermediate- and long-term trends still are bullish. The continuing power of the bull market is supported by both the broad-based indices as well as the small- and midcap stocks. The ability to keep trudging along despite the overwhelming negativity coming from Washington is a powerful argument in favor of the bulls. Bearish momentum is absent.
The strongest sectors continue to be industrials, tech & biotech, consumer discretionary, biotech, pharma, housing, materials and financials. Bonds and bond substitutes have been the weakest.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Dollar and Treasuries likely to lift Gold

English: A sample of crude oil from Haenigsen,...
English: A sample of crude oil from Haenigsen, Germany. Deutsch: Flasche mit Erdöl (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By Colin Twiggs

Sydney, Sept.26, stock watch .- Spot gold continues to test support at $1300/ounce. Failure of support would visit the primary level at $1200/ounce, while respect would test $1440. Breach of the downward trend channel indicates the primary trend is slowing, but recovery above $1440, and a primary up-trend, seem some way off — as does recovery of 13-week Twiggs Momentum above zero.

Spot Gold
The two-hourly chart shows breakout above resistance at $1330. Retracement that respects the new support level would signal a rally to test $1375, improving the chances of a bottom.
Spot Gold

Dollar Index

The Dollar Index broke primary support at 80.50, warning of a primary down-trend. Follow-through below 80 would confirm. A 13-week Twiggs Momentum peak at zero also suggests a down-trend. A falling dollar would boost gold prices. Recovery above 81 is unlikely, but would warn of a bear trap.
Dollar Index
The yield on ten-year Treasury Notes broke support at 2.70 percent, warning of another test of 2.40 percent. Penetration of the rising trendline would strengthen the signal. Falling treasury yields are also likely to lift precious metal prices (because of the lower opportunity cost).
10-Year Treasury Yields

Crude Oil

Nymex light crude broke support at $103/barrel and its rising trendline, warning that the up-trend is slowing. A test of medium-term support at $98/barrel is now likely. The wider spread with Brent Crude is an indication of tensions over Syria which threaten supply.
Brent Crude and Nymex Crude

Commodities

Commodity prices continue to fall, with the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index headed for another test of 124 despite a resilient Shanghai Composite Index. Recovery above 130 is unlikely, but would confirm the earlier double-bottom reversal and a primary up-trend.
Dow Jones UBS Commodities Index
* Target calculation: 130 + ( 130 - 125 ) = 135 ...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

How to Defeat the Hindenburg Omen

The Zeppelin LZ 129 Hindenburg catching fire o...
The Zeppelin LZ 129 Hindenburg catching fire on May 6, 1937 at Lakehurst Naval Air Station in New Jersey. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By Rude Awakening

Baltimore, Aug.20, swing trading .- The stock market is a fiery zeppelin crash waiting to happen.


Well, maybe not. But that's what the financial media coverage of a rather complicated technical indicator would like you to believe.

Everywhere I look, I'm seeing breathless mentions of something called the Hindenburg Omen. Some sources are reporting as many as 11 Hindenburg Omens have materialized just over the past few weeks.

"A Google News search for the term "Hindenburg Omen" returned 6,340 results this weekend, and more than a few dramatic photos of the ill-fated Zeppelin airship," writes my trading buddy Jonas Elmerraji. "Yup, fear is the predominant emotion in stock investors right now – why else would click-hungry media outlets push some obscure market indicator named after a gruesome disaster?"

On top of the perfectly-named Hindenburg Omen, we experienced a 2% drop in the broad market last week. So conditions are ripe for some new worries.

But aside from its catchy (and terrifying) name, what's the deal with the Hindenburg Omen?

For starters, if you've bothered to read any of the articles that cite the indicator, you've probably noticed that none of them really explain what the hell the Hindenburg Omen measures. That's because it's incredibly complicated. Fully grasping the Hindenburg Omen requires more than a rudimentary understanding of simple technical analysis techniques.

I'm not even going to bother wasting my time trying to lay it all out for you. I can't even come up with a simplified explanation beyond the fact that it's bearish and it involves tallying NYSE advances plus declines and new highs vs. new lows. And that doesn't even begin to get into the nuances of what's required to trigger the indicator…

If the Hindenburg Omen had a mundane name, it never would have caught on. Its track record for calling major tops isn't consistent (Hindenburg Omens made similar headlines in 2010, for example). Most people don't even know how it works. It looks good in a bearish market story. But it's not something anyone should use as a trading signal.

It's no secret that the short-term trend for stocks is lower. The S&P 500 has dropped five out of the last six trading days. So far, we've seen a retreat of 3% this month. But if you're prepared for a bigger correction, the big, scary headlines won't ruin what has been a solid year for stocks so far.

Maintain appropriate stop losses and sell when they're triggered. Don't force any new trades while the market is falling. And don't blindly sell out of your positions based solely on fear. Keeping a clear mind during a correction (of any magnitude) will put you eight steps ahead of every other investor on the planet.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Gold Chart of The Week

By INO
Chicago, Aug.20, stocks to watch .- Each Week Longleaftrading.com will be providing us a chart of the week as analyzed by a member of their team. We hope that you enjoy and learn from this new feature.
Weekly Gold Report (August 19th through August 23rd)
Market bulls were dealt a blow last week as stock traders began booking profit on long positions in expectation of a FED taper in their bond purchase program. The selling pushed the stock indexes lower throughout the week until the Dow suffered its largest weekly drop in over a year. Similarly, the US Bond Markets fell under pressure as traders continued to try to anticipate the FED’s next decision regarding Quantitative Easing and Interest Rates.
While the upcoming week is short on economic data from the United States, traders will be looking forward to PMI figures from China and Germany. We will also have an opportunity to review the minutes from the last FOMC Meeting, which should provide decent market movement. Lastly, we will hear from a few FED Members later in the week as they convene for their annual Jackson Hole Symposium.
I anticipate the FED speak will be nothing short of confusing, which has been par for the course over the last several months. When one member is hawkish today, another member is dovish the following day. It makes sense to perpetuate this style of reporting because if every FED member agreed on the scale and timeline of QE, the major financial markets would experience massive directional moves, and a one sided trade. And until the FED actually feels comfortable enough to raise Interest Rates, we should expect this type of reporting and inconsistent FED speak.
The Precious Metals markets seemed to benefit the most from the profit taking selloff from last week. Gold was up 4.60% on the week and Silver was up significantly more. It was obvious that Hedge Funds added to their net long positions in both Precious Metals and speculators also seemed to be along for the rally. It will be interesting to see if the rally continues into this week’s Precious Metals trade. I will be watching the stock markets as my indicator for Metals. If stocks continue to feel pressure this week, I would have to assume that the profit from stocks will continue to spill over into the Metals. If the stocks begin to see some relief from last weeks drop, then I would assume Gold and Silver will consolidate and possibly retrace some of the rally from the prior week.

Gold Futures in the December contract are holding between the 20day and 100day simple moving averages (arrows #1 and #2). Until we hear from the FED members later in the week, I would not be surprised to see Gold Futures continue to consolidate between $1325 and $1375. With the light volume in markets across the board, it is easier for large funds to drive markets with large lot orders, so traders should always be prepared for volatility. But I doubt we will see much until the FED minutes are released later in the week.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 15, 2013

What Do You See in This Chart?

New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange (Photo credit: Mike_fleming)
The bulls see a cup-and-handle formation while the bears see a head-and-shoulders


The Dow Jones Transportation Average fell 0.81%, with 18 of its 20 stocks posting losses. And the Dow industrials fell 0.73% as two economic reports appeared to have a negative impact on stocks. The weekly MBA Mortgage Index fell 4.7%, its 12th decline in the past 14 reports, and July PPI was unchanged while core PPI ticked up by 0.1% where analysts were looking for better results.
At the close, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was off 113 points to 15,338, the S&P 500 fell 9 points to 1,685, and the Nasdaq lost 15 points at 3,669. On the NYSE, decliners outpaced advancers by 1.8-to-1, and on the Nasdaq, decliners were ahead by 1.4-to-1. Volume was light with the Big Board trading 622 million shares and the Nasdaq crossing just 374 million shares.

Chart Key
The S&P 500 chart illustrates the dilemma of this summer’s traders. Some chartists see a cup-and-handle formation in the above chart. This would be a bullish signal with the implication of a broad market breakout with a target of 1,775.
Others see the opposite — a head-and-shoulders top forming with the neckline at 1,676 and a downside target of 1,644.
It’s best not to anticipate either theory, but rather let Mr. Market tell you of his next move.
Conclusion: In the short term, you may be a bull or a bear — there is plenty of evidence on both sides. I’m more in the bear camp short term for reasons I’ve stated ad nauseam for the past week. But all should agree that the long-term trend is still strongly bullish and that a sell-off would be a great opportunity to load up on stocks that will return many-fold over the years. ...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Mr. Market Needs a Crutch

Dow Jones 2006
Dow Jones 2006 (Photo credit: caseorganic)
Dow industrials, transports sit on perilous technical ground


Banks and other financial stocks took a hit as the impact of Department of Justice lawsuits against Bank of America (BAC) worried investors that the group could be under scrutiny. But in a low-volume session, the biggest surprise was a decline of 0.7% in the Dow Jones Transportation Average, which many consider a gauge of future manufacturing results.
At the close, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was off 48 points at 15471, the S&P 500 fell 6 points to 1691, and theNasdaq closed at 3654, off 12 points.
The NYSE traded just 657 million shares and Nasdaq crossed 398 million shares in one of the lightest trading days of the year. Decliners outpaced advancers on both the Big Board and Nasdaq by more than 2-to-1.

Chart Key
Although the overall trend is bullish, the near-term is in doubt. Note two inflection points: the May closing high at 15409 and the July low of 15405. Just four sessions ago, the Dow industrials broke to new highs. However, the break was followed by three days down, and yesterday’s low came perilously close to the support line connecting the two highlighted points. A break of the line would likely result in a test of the 50-day moving average at 15,239 (blue line). Also, MACD has flashed a sell signal.
Like the industrials, the Dow transports broke to a new high and then rolled over in an even deeper correction with four consecutive down days. By penetrating both its near-term bullish support line and 20-day moving average on an opening gap down, its near-term trend must be considered very weak.
The more income-oriented Dow index — the Dow Jones Utility Average — rose yesterday and flashed a CBR buy signal (our proprietary indicator). And it closed slightly above its 20-day moving average at 504.17.
Conclusion: After six weeks of one of the most aggressive advances on record, the small- and midcap stocks are suffering an inevitable correction. But yesterday’s charts show that the more staid Dow series of indices also appear to be losing strength, and that could spell trouble for the entire market.
Jeff Saut notes that equities appear to be losing strength when gauged by the NYSE Advance/Decline Line, which measures the difference between the number of advancing and declining issues. When the market makes new highs, technicians like to see more stocks make new highs. But the recent A/D line did not show more new highs and instead showed fewer stocks making new highs — this is a non-confirmation of the recent breakout. And, along with our charts of the Dow indices, it makes me wonder whether the August breakout was “false.” If so, we could be in for a serious round of profit taking.
Tomorrow, I’ll provide downside targets for a possible market correction. ...
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Safety Net: Why You Shouldn’t Worry About Earnings

omega
omega (Photo credit: davedehetre)
By Welthy Retirement

Palo Alto, Aug.8, stocks to watch .- In October 2011, I recommended Omega Healthcare Investors Inc (NYSE: OHI) in my former newsletter, The Ultimate Income Letter. The stock remains in The Oxford Club’s Perpetual Income Portfolio (which I am no longer personally tracking). Since it was first recommended, it has returned 86%. During the same period, the S&P 500 has returned 40%.
For the past few weeks, several readers of The Safety Net have requested I take a look at the dividend safety of Omega Healthcare, which operates as a landlord for nursing homes and long-term care facilities.
At the time, the sector was very beaten down due to worries about cuts to Medicare. That enabled us to snag an investment with an 8.9% dividend yield. Because the stock has appreciated so much, it currently offers a yield of 6.2%. But investors who got in on the original recommendation are enjoying a yield of 10.6% now that the dividend has increased from $0.40 per share in late 2011 to $0.47 now. A 17.5% increase in less than two years. That’s why I’m such an advocate of the dividend growth strategy. Most people would be thrilled with a 17.5% raise in less than two years. That doesn’t happen too often in the working world. But in the right dividend stocks, it can happen all the time.

But I digress. Back to whether Omega’s dividend is still safe.

As a real estate investment trust (REIT), Omega Healthcare must pay 90% of its earnings back to shareholders in the form of dividends. As a result, the company, and other REITs, do not pay corporate income tax on those earnings.
But anyone who has read my columns for even just a little while knows that I consider earnings to be just the beginning part of the cash flow equation. I don’t worry about earnings. I look at cash flow because cash flow tells the real story as to the health of the business.
A company could have great earnings, but if it has no cash left over at the end of the quarter or year to reinvest back into the business or pay shareholders their dividends, that’s a problem.
So let’s take a look at Omega’s numbers to determine if the dividend is indeed safe.
For the first half of 2013, Omega earned $0.76 per share but paid out $0.91 per share. Someone who looked at the company’s payout ratio would see an alarming 120%, meaning the company is paying out 120% of its earnings in the form of dividends.
That would scare off most investors because that is typically not sustainable. But this is a perfect example of why I don’t worry about earnings when it comes to dividend safety.
REITs often report cash flow as funds from operations, or FFO. For the first six months of the year, Omega’s FFO was $1.25 per share. That’s a big difference from $0.76 per share, especially when comparing it to $0.91 per share in dividends paid.
The reason for the big difference is non-cash items. When calculating net income, Omega expensed over $64 million in depreciation and amortization. Those are non-cash expenses. In other words, Omega did not actually pay out $64 million in cash for those expenses in the first half of the year. Yet those non-cash expenses lower net income.
Because a non-cash expense does not reflect the actual movement of cash, it is added back into cash flow calculations. A few other smaller adjustments and the company reported FFO of $144.5 million instead of $87 million in net income. That’s a big difference.

Now instead of a 120% payout ratio when using earnings as the basis, we have a payout ratio of 73% when using FFO. Also a big and meaningful difference.

Typically, I like to see a payout ratio of 75% or lower. That gives me the confidence that even if the company hits a rough patch, it will be able to continue to increase the dividend in the near future.
Omega Healthcare Investors has raised the dividend for 11 consecutive years. Last year, it raised the dividend twice during the year.
If Omega was able to increase the dividend even during very difficult periods of Medicare cuts and uncertainty, considering it has plenty of cash flow, I see no reason why it won’t be able to continue to raise the dividend for the foreseeable future.
Dividend Safety Rating: A


...

Enhanced by Zemanta

A Reliable Account of the Great Depression

English: Murray Rothbard in the 90's
English: Murray Rothbard in the 90's (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By Daily Reckoning


Washington, Aug.8, stock watch .- For his U.S. economic history class at UNLV, Murray Rothbard gave us the assignment to write a 10-page paper. The paper could be on anything we wanted it to be. However, we had to clear the topic with him.

When I proposed writing about the Great Depression, Murray was thrilled and rattled off a number of sources. Near the top of his list was a book he described as "fantastic, except it has a terrible title."

That book was a Laissez Faire Club featured selection -- Economics and the Public Welfare: A Financial and Economic History of the United States, 1914-1946 by Benjamin M. Anderson. As you can imagine, this is a book I have very fond memories of. My copy still has paper clips marking several pages. The text is underlined throughout.

Anderson was one of the first economists to provide a systematic account of the causes of the Great Depression. It remains the most reliable documentary guide to precisely what happened, before, during, and after. That is the essence of this book.

Anderson had feet both in academia and banking. He was on the faculty at Columbia and later at Harvard, and then joined National Bank of Commerce in 1918. Two years later, he moved to Chase National Bank to serve as economist and editor of the Chase Economic Bulletin.

He was also a world-class chess player and wrote what's been described as a brilliant preface to Jose Capablanca's book A Primer of Chess. Sadly, Anderson never saw Economics and the Public Welfare in print. He died of a heart attack just prior to its publication.

The years between the forming of the Federal Reserve and the end of World War II are some of the most interesting and formative years in U.S. economic history. Of course, the common narrative we constantly hear is the "monetarist" version parroted by Ben Bernanke that the central bank erred on the side of tightness and the money supply plunged, lengthening the Great Depression, and it was ultimately only fixed with a massive government works program known as WWII.

Instead, imagine having a correspondent on the ground keeping a rich, informed diary of the day-to-day, week-to-week, and year-to-year events as seen through the eyes of an Austrian economist, from the creation of the Federal Reserve through the Great Depression to Bretton Woods. That is what Economics and the Public Welfare is.

Anderson provides some theory along the way, but what this great book primarily does is chronicle monetary and economic events from the beginning of the Fed's operation to after the war. Politics, stock prices, and banking and trade data, plus a fast-paced narrative combine to make the reader feel like he or she is there.

As you would expect a bank economist would, Anderson provides a blizzard of numbers to provide emphasis for his story.

For instance, Anderson provides the principal resource and liability items of the Federal Reserve during the war. Total resources ballooned from $637 million in 1915 to $5.2 billion in 1918. On the liabilities side, Federal Reserve notes in circulation exploded as well, from $165 million to $2.5 billion, as did member banks' reserve deposits, which increased from $398 million to $1.7 billion.

As measured by percentage growth, this is greater balance sheet growth than the Bernanke Fed post '08 crash. Seeing these astonishing numbers triggers a realization: The years from 2008-13 amount to our own World War I. One hundred years ago, this sort of thing led to the post-boom crash of 1920 and unleashed the distortions of the roaring '20s that led to the second major crash of 1929.

Back in these days, the banking system also found itself flush with reserves. With bank reserves held at the Fed and not being lent out, the money market tightened and rates increased, despite bank credit expanding. After dropping to 1% in 1915, the bank call rate rose sharply to 7% in 1917. Bond yields also went up. "The pressure of firm money rates undoubtedly did a great deal to retard bank expansion and to hold it down to necessary things," Anderson wrote.

Of course, in similar fashion, bank reserves are also piling up at today's Fed, and money is, indeed, tight for the average person. Even so, the Fed of those days was not nearly as reckless as ours is today. The Bernanke Fed works overtime to keep money tight but rates uber-low in aid of the government, big banks, and speculators on Wall Street.

If you haven't ever heard of Benjamin Anderson and wonder about his hard money, anti-Keynesian bona fides (after all, he did work for a bank), this quote from Chapter 1 gives you an idea:

"The very inelasticity of our prewar (World War I) system made it safer than the extreme ductility of mismanaged credit under the Federal Reserve System in the period since early 1924. The whole world was, moreover, far safer financially when each of the main countries stood on its own feet and carried its own gold."
More than once, the reader will stumble upon a sentence that will make him smile. What's old is new again. We've taken note that Iowa farmland is looking bubblelike in 2012 and 2013. Sure enough, in his chapter on the 1920-21 crisis (what, you've never heard of that one?), Anderson offers a small section "Land Speculation -- Iowa."

In a footnote, the author remembers what an Iowa City banker told him. "I know that you economists say that land is only worth what it will produce, but it does look like some of this land around here is worth a thousand dollars an acre."

Plugging that $1,000 into the inflation calculator turns up a number of $11,100 per acre in 2011. It's almost eerie that the average price of land in O'Brien County, Iowa, last year was $12,862 per acre, a 35% increase over the 2011 average.

Not so famously, the government didn't intervene in those unenlightened dark ages. Wages and wholesale price levels crashed. The result, says Anderson: "In 1920-21, we took our losses, we readjusted our financial structure, we endured our depression, and in August 1921, we started up again. By the spring of 1923, we had reached new highs in industrial production and we had labor shortages in many lines."

The chapter I have bookmarked with the most passages highlighted is "Digression on Keynes." For nearly 20 pages, Anderson takes on Lord Keynes, whom he describes as "a dangerously unsound thinker." Anderson points out that Keynes heavily influenced Roosevelt and all economists who worked for the government. In The General Theory, Keynes targets a passage from J.S. Mill out of context to challenge the idea that aggregate supply and aggregate demand grow together.

The author points out that Keynes and his followers think in aggregates. He provides an aggregate supply function and an aggregate demand function. While human action is economics, there is no discussion of interrelationships. "Nowhere is there a recognition that different elements in the aggregate supply give rise to demand for other elements in the aggregate supply."

Our governments, corporations, and individuals pile up debt seemingly with impunity. The ideas of balanced budgets and living within our means are thought to be quaint. Modern Keynesians like Paul Krugman pooh-pooh the notion of balanced budgets and fiscal restraint. Where could he get such a notion? Anderson explains:

"Where economists generally have held that saving and avoiding unnecessary debt and paying off debt where possible are good things, Keynes holds that they are bad things. He disparages depreciation reserves for business corporations. He disparages amortization of public debt by municipalities. He disparages additions to corporate surpluses out of earnings."
There are entire books devoted to challenging Lord Keynes and The General Theory. But, Anderson's short chapter will provide you all the ammunition you need.

Near the end, the author reprints a memo he penned for private circulation that eventually found its way throughout government. The contents of the memo are considerable. However, one small snippet speaks to current Fed policy:

"Inflation is not something that you can turn off and on like water at a faucet. Inflation and deflation are not simple terms and they are not simple opposites. There is no financial Westinghouse air brake by means of which an inflationary movement can be tapered off and brought gently to an end without shock. Rather, inflationary forces engendered in defiance of sound financial policy may seem harmless for a long time and then suddenly break force into great violence."
There is an enormous amount of wisdom in this book. Everyone trying to understand monetary and economic policy during the Depression or today and the subsequent effects should have Economics and the Public Welfare loaded and ready to read cover to cover, or to refer to often. Anderson is an indispensable guide to government monetary policy, as it happened, that still haunts us today.

Being the kind of guy he was, Rothbard recommended Anderson's great book before recommending his own America's Great Depression. Both are amazing. But Murray had the benefit of Anderson's work in writing his. He cites him no fewer than 15 times.
...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Why $100 Crude Could Send This 8.4% Yielder Soaring

Diamond Offshore Drilling
Diamond Offshore Drilling (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By StreetAuthority


Austin, Jul.31, swing trading .- Despite the markets' push to record levels, energy stocks have been locked into a bearish slump for the past two years.
With natural gas plummeting to an all-time low in the summer of 2012 and crude contained by slow economic growth, energy stocks have been big underperformers. That shows up in the sector's 3% gain in the past five years, 12% gain in the past three and just 7% gain in 2013 against the S&P 500's 20%.
But with natural gas trading well above its multi-year low and crude recently breaking above $100, the stage could be set for a rebound.
One of my favorite ways to cash in on the energy trade is with offshore drillers. I'm bullish on the offshore drilling industry because that's where most of the new oil is being found. In the past decade, more than 40% of all newly discovered oil was found in ultra-deep water, bypassing both onshore and near-shore discoveries. Big finds in the Gulf of Mexico and off the coasts of Brazil and Africa will also continue to drive demand for offshore drilling services.
There are plenty of great offshore drillers to choose from, including Transocean (NYSE: RIG), Diamond Offshore Drilling (NYSE: DO) and Noble Energy (NYSE: NBL). But my favorite pick from the group is SeaDrill (Nasdaq: SDRL), one of the largest offshore drillers in the world with a fleet of 66 drill ships and a market cap of $20 billion. With crude surging above $100, Seadrill is up 20% in the past two months. Take a look:
But looking forward, Seadrill stands out from its peers because of its unique combination of growth, value and income.
As one of the largest offshore drillers in the world, Seadrill operates in the shallow, mid- and deepwater markets, providing the company with a diversified revenue stream. But the ultra-deepwater market is the fastest growing, and that's where Seadrill is making targeted investments to capitalize on the bullish trend.
On July 15, Seadrill announced it had placed an order for four new ultra-deepwater drilling rigs scheduled for delivery in 2015. Seadrill capitalized on weakness in the Asian shipbuilding market, negotiating a unit cost of less than $600 million. Each new rig is projected to produce $100 million a year in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and expected to add 10% to total EBITDA by 2016.
As one of the largest offshore drillers in the world, Seadrill operates in the shallow, mid- and deepwater markets. But the ultra-deepwater market is the fastest growing, and that's where Seadrill is looking to capitalize.
Seadrill will also continue to capitalize on rising day rates as it renegotiates existing contracts and enters new ones. On July 11, Seadrill announced it had secured a 30-month $214 million contract for its West Freedom jack-up rig. That equates to a day rate of $234,000, which is a huge premium to its current day rate of $155,000, a great example of the cyclical nature of the drilling industry and the impact that a bullish trend can have on earnings.
Seadrill also boasts a dividend yield of 8.4%, more than three times the current return on the 10-year Treasury. That has led to speculation about the sustainability of Seadrill's dividend. For the time being, higher day rates are driving the company's cash flow to support a high dividend yield. But Seadrill is a leveraged play, with $8.8 billion in long-term debt and $816 million in cash and equivalents, increasing its vulnerability to economic cycles.
With Seadrill investing in future growth and capitalizing on rising day rates, analysts are bullish, projecting earnings growth of 29% in 2013 and 30% in 2014. Seadrill's earnings are expected to grow 22% a year over the next five years, a huge premium to the industry average of 12%.
Risks to Consider: The energy industry is particularly sensitive to global economic growth. Seadrill is also a leveraged play in the offshore drilling industry, making the company more vulnerable to economic cycles.
Action to Take --> Energy stocks have been out of favor for the past two years, with many leading names trading near record-low valuations. But with natural gas trading well above its multi-year low and crude breaking above $100 for the first time in two years, this could be a long-term turn in the market. Seadrill is a great way to play that trend. In spite of the company's bullish outlook, Seadrill's forward price-to-earnings ratio of 15 is in line with its peer average of 14 and just a small premium to its 10-year average of 12. When you add its impressive 8.4% dividend yield, Seadrill makes for a compelling combination of growth and income.
P.S. -- Last year, Seadrill Partners (NYSE: SDLP) went public after splitting from its parent company, Seadrill. Since then, the stock has risen more than 20% and offers a generous yield of 5%. These "Rich Parent" stocks are one of our favorite ways to profit in the market right now. One is a low-risk play that has already returned 333% since going public in 2008, while another yields nearly 10%.
...
Enhanced by Zemanta