Sepia photograph of the "Atlas" statue in New York City. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Quite clearly, there have been two very significant regimes with regard the relative valuation of government bonds and equities. We suspect few have seen the full history as all too often the argument of high relative equity yields is only considered in the last 50 years…
and looked at on the more apples to apples basis of corporate bond financing vs equity capital (corporate bond yield vs equity dividend yield) – it is clear that we have seen two huge phases (red and green) and perhaps where we currently sit is a reversion to the pre-WWII spendathon era relative value perspective of stocks and bonds…
Charts: Deutsche Bank
Via Deutsche Bank:
So while equities may out-perform bonds over any sensible medium-term horizon from this starting point, we’re not sure it will be through a conscious asset allocation switch. It will be more through dividend accumulation and re-investment against ultra low bond yield competition. ... Continue to read.There is little doubt that on the dividend vs. bond yield measure, equities look as good relative value as they have done for at least half a century. However it’s fair to say that both yields are low in absolute terms, but that bonds are at extreme levels relative to history.Are the more competitive equity yields a threat to bond markets as funds look to switch out of fixed income for better value? It’s easy to conclude that the answer is yes but fixed income yields still need to be as low as the authorities can make them to ensure that the debt mountain that virtually all developed countries have across public and private sectors are funded smoothly. With this in mind it’s unlikely that regulatory flows will move substantially away from fixed income in the near future. We also may still see risk aversion regularly hit markets which will generally keep the bid for perceived safe havens high.
No comments:
Post a Comment